William III in Delftware. Seen in the Rijksmuseum

William III Delftware bust in Rijksmuseum | 威廉三世代尔夫特陶瓷半身像在国立博物馆

The Netherlands is famous for its ceramics, so it’s no surprise that a visit to the Rijksmuseum leads to a room filled with beautiful examples of this art form, many of which hold significant historical value. Among the photos I took, one features a ceramic bust of a man, who turns out to be King-Stadtholder William III of Orange. When I visit museums, I seldom read all the labels next to the objects. Taking many photos and later researching them online allows me to explore the artefacts I saw more thoroughly. This way I get a stronger impression of the places I visited.

In the display glass case, William III of Orange is shown alongside that of his wife, Queen Mary II of England, Scotland, and Ireland, about whom I wrote a few weeks ago, showcasing another bust of her that is exhibited in the same room as the ceramics. The placement of hers there is no coincidence – Queen Mary II was known for her love of the Dutch ceramics – the tin-glazed earthenware known as Delftware. During her lifetime in the 17th century, Delft in the Netherlands was a renowned centre for the production of this type of ceramic, which became highly popular across Europe. Interestingly, the ceramic busts of the royal couple, although placed next to each other, were produced by two different Delftware manufacturers, as indicated by information from the Rijksmuseum.

William III Delftware bust in Rijksmuseum

William III Delftware bust in Rijksmuseum, portreys the Stadtholder of several Dutch provinces, who lived in the second half of the 17th century. He played a crucial role in defending the Netherlands against French invasions during the Franco-Dutch War. In 1677, William III married Mary Stuart, the daughter of James II of England, a union that would later have significant political implications. In 1688, William III was invited by English nobles to overthrow his Catholic father-in-law, James II, in an effort to ensure that England remained a Protestant country. His successful invasion led to the joint monarchy of William III and Mary II in England, marking the beginning of a constitutional monarchy where the powers of the crown were limited by Parliament.

William III Delftware bust in Rijksmuseum stands as a testament not only to the historical significance of the monarch but also to the rich tradition of Dutch ceramics. Delftware, the tin-glazed earthenware produced in Delft, gained widespread acclaim across Europe for its quality and artistic value. The bust is attributed to the renowned Delft pottery factory De Metaale Pot. De Metaale Pot was known for its high-quality ceramics and artistic achievements. The factory became particularly famous for its ability to produce large, sculptural earthenware pieces, a feat made possible by employing a skilled French modeller.

The production of porcelain, or more specifically tin-glazed earthenware known as Delftware, in the Netherlands began to flourish in the 17th century during the Dutch Golden Age. Initially, the Dutch East India Company imported Chinese porcelain on a large scale, which was highly popular in Europe. European artisans, particularly those in Delft, aimed to replicate its appearance. However, due to the lack of suitable raw materials and technology, European ceramicists had to rely on tin-glazing – a technique that, interestingly, originated in the Middle East and was introduced to Europe through Spain and Portugal several centuries earlier. When the supply of Chinese porcelain was interrupted due to internal issues in China, Dutch craftsmen saw an opportunity to produce similar items locally on a large scale. Delft became the main centre of ceramic production in the Netherlands.

Previously known for its beer production, Delft saw a shift to ceramics as the brewing industry declined. Craftsmen in Delft developed a method that allowed them to create wares that resembled Chinese porcelain but were actually made from clay coated with tin glaze, giving them their characteristic white colour. Unlike Chinese porcelain, which is made from a special fine clay (kaolin) and fired at very high temperatures to create a hard, translucent material, European faience (such as Delftware) is made from a coarser clay and is fired at lower temperatures. This results in a more porous material that is then covered with a tin glaze to achieve the desired white, opaque finish. Delftware became popular for its quality and aesthetics, as well as for the ability to decorate the items with blue patterns that imitated Chinese porcelain. The ceramic industry in Delft thrived, and at its peak in the 17th century, the city was home to about 30 ceramic factories.

Among the most important Delftware producers in the 17th century were De Metaale Pot, which, under the leadership of Lambertus van Eenhoorn, became one of the most prominent factories in Delft, known for its innovation and production of large ceramic sculptures, such as busts and vases. Another notable producer was De Grieksche A, which was known for producing high-quality ceramics and was a favourite supplier of Queen Mary II. De Grieksche A specialised in more elegant and artistic forms, which attracted wealthy clients. Lastly, De Porceleyne Fles, is one of the most famous Delftware producers and, remarkably, the only factory from the 17th century that has survived to this day and continues to produce Delftware.

Other Delftware artefacts on display in the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam

Delftware is still produced today, although on a smaller scale than in the 17th century. De Porceleyne Fles (now Royal Delft) remains active and continues to produce traditional Delftware using the same techniques that were employed during the golden age of Dutch ceramics. While Delftware is now produced in other parts of the world, often as tourist souvenirs, authentic Delftware from Delft is still highly valued for its artistic and historical significance.

William III in Delftware. Seen in the Rijksmuseum

Lessons Learned in the Rijksmuseum: Inside the Lives of the Dutch Bourgeoisie

When one thinks of the Rijksmuseum, the first association is often with the masterpieces of the Dutch Golden Age. However, the museum is much more than just a collection of fine art; it is a rich tapestry of Dutch history, culture, and daily life. This history is vividly portrayed not only in the paintings but also in the museum’s extensive collection of everyday objects.

Rijksmuseum, located in Amsterdam, is the largest and most renowned museum in the Netherlands, dedicated to Dutch art and history. Established in 1798, the museum is a treasure trove of cultural heritage. It is divided into several key sections, including the Dutch Golden Age paintings, a vast collection of historical artifacts, decorative arts, and a comprehensive display of Dutch colonial history.

Rijksmuseum at first glance

The wealth of the Dutch bourgeoisie primarily stemmed from the dynamic development of international trade during the 17th century, known as the Dutch Golden Age. During this period, the Netherlands became one of the world’s most powerful trading centers, largely due to the activities of organizations such as the Dutch East India Company and the Dutch West India Company. Trade in spices, silk, porcelain, and even slaves generated enormous profits, fueling the growth of cities, infrastructure, and culture. Investments in banking, shipping, and innovative agricultural practices further strengthened the position of the Dutch bourgeoisie, making it one of the wealthiest and most influential social classes in Europe at that time.

To understand how the Dutch bourgeoisie lived during this era, we can first look at the details captured in the paintings. The Dutch painters of the Golden Age were, in fact, portraitists of the wealthy bourgeoisie. They didn’t just capture their faces but also depicted how they lived, what they ate, and the interiors of their homes. These paintings reveal a wealth of details. If we compare this to how many of us share glimpses of our lives on social media today, it’s clear that the Dutch of the Golden Age did something similar, but instead of using photography, they employed and generously paid skilled portraitists to document their lives.

In the first painting we see a lively and joyful scene where a family gathered around the table enjoys a meal together. The home interior is warm and cosy. We see an indulgent feast and carefree atmosphere, subtly hinting at the potential for excess and moral laxity in the pursuit of pleasure. The paintings illustrate as well how the contents of Dutch bourgeois tables evolved, reflecting their growing wealth and refined tastes. In one painting, we see a roasted turkey, a symbol of luxury and abundance. In another, oysters – a delicacy considered a rarity. We see the transition from simple, local foods to more exotic and luxurious dishes, a result of the expanding global trade networks. The depiction of the civic guard members and the banquet celebrating a peace treaty clearly show how important fashion and elegance were in Dutch society. The men are dressed in richly decorated uniforms, which not only emphasise their roles and social status but also reflect their prestige and concern for appearance. It is notable that women are absent from these paintings, highlighting the male dominance in these formal and public spaces, particularly in military and official contexts.

Another key element in the museum that illustrates what a wealthy Dutch home might have looked like is the collection of dollhouses, which showcase complete homes, meticulously furnished down to the finest detail. The dollhouses on display at the Rijksmuseum were far from being mere children’s toys. These miniature homes were crafted as a hobby for wealthy women in the 17th and 18th centuries. They are not only works of art in their own right but also serve as detailed records of domestic interiors of the time.

The museum houses several exquisite examples, including the famous dollhouse of Petronella Oortman (on the upper photo), crafted between 1686 and 1710. This dollhouse is a meticulous replica of a grand canal house in Amsterdam. Every room is furnished with tiny, yet incredibly detailed versions of the furniture, textiles, and household items that would have been found in an affluent home of that era. Through these miniature worlds, visitors can explore the daily life of the Dutch bourgeoisie, from the layout of the kitchen to the luxury of the parlour. The attention to detail is astounding, with miniature paintings, hand-painted wallpaper, and even tiny porcelain dishes adorning the tables.

Finally, the museum’s collection also includes individual pieces of furniture and everyday objects displayed throughout various sections. The furniture collection includes everything from simple pieces such as beds, chests, and wardrobes to more elaborate and intricately carved cabinets. Some of these 17th-century pieces reflect the Calvinist values of austerity and modesty that were prevalent in Dutch society at the time. However, other items in the collection reveal the splendour of the homes of the Dutch elite, where no expense was spared in displaying wealth and taste. One prime example is the collection of cabinets. These are not only masterpieces of furniture craftsmanship, featuring countless compartments and intricate wood carvings, but they also serve as canvases for miniature works of art, with tiny paintings created using various techniques.

The furniture showcased in the Rijksmuseum was crafted from high-quality materials, including rich woods such as oak and walnut, which were commonly used in Dutch furniture making during the Golden Age. These pieces often featured intricate inlays and embellishments made from materials like ebony, mother-of-pearl, and sometimes bone or other fine materials. Notable makers of these exquisite pieces included famous Dutch cabinetmakers of the 17th century, such as Herman Doomer and Pierre Gole, who were renowned for their skill in creating finely crafted furniture. These artisans often worked in major cities like Amsterdam, The Hague, and Leiden, where they combined local craftsmanship with imported materials and influences from across Europe. Their work was highly sought after by the Dutch elite and continues to be admired in museums around the world today.

Lessons Learned in the Rijksmuseum: Inside the Lives of the Dutch Bourgeoisie

Van Gogh. Genius, Struggle and a Posthumous Fortune

He sold almost nothing during his lifetime. Now his paintings are auctioned for millions, printed on mugs, and displayed in packed museums. A visit to the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam offers not just a look at the art – but at the myth that grew around the artist.

Vincent van Gogh was a Dutch post-impressionist painter, born in Groot-Zundert, Netherlands. Over his lifetime, he created more than two thousand artworks, including around 860 oil paintings, most of which were produced in the last two years of his life.

Van Gogh’s early works were dark and sombre, reflecting the influence of the Dutch masters. This period, known as his Dutch phase, lasted from around 1880 to 1885 and focused on depicting peasant life and the harsh realities of rural existence. His early paintings predominantly used dark, earthy tones such as browns, greys, and muted greens, inspired by the works of artists like Rembrandt and Frans Hals, whom he admired.

In 1886, Van Gogh moved to Paris, where he encountered the works of the Impressionists and Neo-Impressionists. This exposure led to a significant shift in his style. He began to use brighter colours and experimented with more dynamic brushwork, moving away from the dark and sombre tones of his earlier works. This transition marked the beginning of his journey toward the vibrant and expressive paintings for which he is best known.

In 1888, Van Gogh moved to Arles in southern France. His time in Arles was both highly productive and tumultuous, marked by his struggle with mental illness. Despite his illness, he continued to paint, creating some of his most profound work. On July 27, 1890, Van Gogh shot himself and died two days later at the age of 37.

Vincent van Gogh’s emotional and mental health struggles profoundly influenced his life and work. While there is no definitive diagnosis, it is widely believed that he suffered from several mental health issues, including severe depression, bipolar disorder, and possibly borderline personality disorder. He went through prolonged periods of sadness, hopelessness, isolation, and complete withdrawal from social life. During these episodes, he often stopped painting or wrote about feeling useless, a burden, or emotionally paralysed. In some letters to his brother, he expressed deep despair and a sense that his efforts had no meaning or impact. His behaviour also included sudden shifts in mood and energ. He would go through intense bursts of creative activity – sometimes painting a dozen works in just a few weeks – followed by equally intense crashes, where he became exhausted, anxious, or withdrawn. He intensevely feared abandonment, his relationships were instable and his emotional reactions he brought to extreme.

Van Gogh’s mental health issues became apparent in his early adulthood. Mental illness ran in his family, suggesting a genetic predisposition. Additionally, his financial instability, professional frustrations, and tumultuous personal relationships added significant stress to his life. Van Gogh’s use of alcohol, particularly absinthe, may have further exacerbated his mental health issues.

One of the most well-known episodes in Vincent van Gogh’s life was the ear-cutting incident, which followed a heated argument with his friend and fellow artist, Paul Gauguin, who had come to stay with him in Arles. Van Gogh and Gauguin first met in Paris, where they were part of the avant-garde art scene. They shared a common interest in new approaches to art. Van Gogh appreciated Gauguin’s bold use of colour and symbolic content, while Gauguin respected Van Gogh’s emotive use of colour and dynamic brushwork.

Gauguin arrived in Arles in October 1888, and the two artists initially worked side by side, discussing and influencing each other’s work. However, significant differences in their artistic visions and temperaments soon emerged. Van Gogh’s intuitive and emotional approach to painting clashed with Gauguin’s more methodical and symbolic style. Living together in close quarters exacerbated their personal differences, and Van Gogh’s mental health issues, including bouts of depression and erratic behaviour, further strained the relationship. The tension culminated in a heated argument on December 23, 1888. That night, after Gauguin threatened to leave, Van Gogh experienced a severe mental breakdown and cut off part of his own left ear. This dramatic event led to Gauguin’s immediate departure from Arles. The exact details of the argument are not fully known, but it is believed to have been intense and emotionally charged. Vincent later created several self-portraits that depicted his bandaged ear, reflecting on this traumatic event. These works are among his most famous. Following the ear incident, Van Gogh and Gauguin never saw each other again. However, they continued to correspond sporadically, maintaining a distant but respectful relationship.

After the ear incident, Van Gogh was hospitalised multiple times. He voluntarily admitted himself to the Saint-Paul-de-Mausole asylum in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence in 1889. During his time there, he continued to paint, producing some of his most famous works, despite experiencing frequent episodes of psychosis.

Van Gogh’s work, initially not well received, gained widespread acclaim only after his death. He often struggled financially, which influenced his work and methods. Due to his limited resources, he sometimes couldn’t afford to pay for models. As a result, he painted numerous self-portraits. Van Gogh created over 30 self-portraits between 1886 and 1889. These self-portraits are not only a study of his own image but also an exploration of different techniques and styles, allowing him to practise without incurring additional costs.

In addition to his self-portraits, Van Gogh would often paint on both sides of the canvas to save money. This practice allowed him to make the most of his limited materials. Some of his paintings hence have another work hidden on the reverse side, which has been discovered through modern technology such as X-ray imaging.

Theo van Gogh, Vincent van Gogh’s brother, played a crucial role in his life and career. Theo provided Vincent with regular financial support, which allowed him to buy art supplies and cover basic living expenses. The brothers maintained a close and deeply supportive relationship, primarily through their extensive correspondence. Theo was an art dealer in Paris, which exposed him to the contemporary art scene. He introduced Vincent to new artistic movements and influential artists, significantly impacting Vincent’s style and techniques. Theo was a tireless advocate for Vincent’s art. He promoted his brother’s work within his professional network, helping to arrange exhibitions and attempting to sell his paintings. Despite these efforts, Vincent achieved little commercial success during his lifetime. After Vincent’s death, Theo continued to promote his brother’s work, helping to secure his posthumous fame. Tragically, Theo died just six months after Vincent, in January 1891, but his efforts were crucial in ensuring that Vincent van Gogh’s artistic legacy endured.

After the deaths of Vincent and his brother Theo, it was Theo’s widow, Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, who played a pivotal role in bringing Vincent’s work to the world’s attention. She inherited Vincent’s paintings and letters, and devoted herself to promoting his art and legacy. Johanna organised exhibitions of Vincent’s work and published his letters, which helped to reveal the depth and passion of his artistic vision. These exhibitions were crucial in introducing his work to a broader audience

One of the first major exhibitions of Van Gogh’s work was held in Paris, receiving significant attention from both critics and the public. It was organised by Ambroise Vollard, a prominent art dealer in Paris, known for his support of Post-Impressionist artists. As an influential dealer, Vollard had the connections and reputation to attract collectors and critics to the exhibition, significantly boosting Van Gogh’s posthumous fame. 

Vincent van Gogh’s paintings remain some of the most expensive and desirable artworks in the world. Notable sales include “Portrait of Dr. Gachet,” which sold for $82.5 million in 1990, “Laboureur dans un champ,” which fetched $81.3 million in 2017, and “Irises,” sold for $53.9 million in 1987. Other significant sales are “L’Allée des Alyscamps,” which went for $66.3 million in 2015, and “Landscape Under Stormy Sky,” sold for $54 million in 2021.

These high prices reflect the legacy and universal appeal of Van Gogh’s artistic vision. He painted in solitude, struggled in silence, and left behind a legacy that would only be recognised long after his death. Today, his life is as closely examined as his brushstrokes. Visiting the museum in Amsterdam, and reading about the prices his work now commands, it’s hard not to think about how easily genius can be overlooked. Still, much of what we know and admire today is thanks to Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, his brother Theo’s widow, who preserved his letters, promoted his paintings, and quietly shaped the image of the artist we now recognise.

Van Gogh. Genius, Struggle and a Posthumous Fortune