The Eagle’s Nest in the Clouds. When the View Disappears

The Eagle’s Nest is one of those places that most people have heard of long before they arrive. I knew only one thing about it – that it had once been associated with Adolf Hitler. I also expected spectacular views from the mountain on which it stands. However, halfway up it became clear that we would not see any mountains that day. We were literally inside a cloud. The building itself was completely engulfed by it. At one point, visibility dropped to just a few metres. People would suddenly emerge from the milky white haze and then disappear into it again moments later. The stone steps leading towards the summit vanished into the grey. There were no valleys, no peaks, and not even a sense of the true scale of the place. It was difficult to tell where the building ended and where the surrounding space began. For a while, the Eagle’s Nest seemed suspended somewhere between rock and cloud, cut off from the landscape around it.

Had the weather cooperated, I would probably have spent much of my time admiring the Alpine panorama and photographing the landscape. Instead, there was little point in standing by the stone walls searching for distant peaks. There was nothing to photograph beyond the building itself and its immediate surroundings. As a result, my attention gradually shifted towards the history of the place, its architecture, and the role it had played nearly ninety years ago.

Before travelling to the Eagle’s Nest, I had done no research at all. I had not even made a quick search online. I had no idea what to expect and arrived without any particular expectations. Yet while taking a selfie in one of the rooms, I suddenly recognised the view behind me. I was certain that I had seen it somewhere before. What was more, I distinctly remembered that there had probably been no windows in that part of the building – something that later proved to be true when I checked. I must have come across this place either in a book or in a documentary at some point in the past.

The Eagle’s Nest is not an ordinary mountain lodge, nor is it simply another viewpoint on the map of the Alps. It is a surviving remnant of a very specific political and ideological world that has long since disappeared, yet left behind tangible traces. Over the decades, the building has accumulated countless legends, simplifications and myths. Contrary to popular belief, it was not Hitler’s home. Nor was it the main seat of the Nazi leadership. It was not even a place where Hitler spent much of his time. The Eagle’s Nest is one of those sites that exists in the public imagination more as a symbol than as an actual building. Most people know it in connection with Hitler, the Third Reich, or its spectacular location high in the mountains. Far fewer are familiar with what it really was, how it came into being, and what purpose it was originally intended to serve.

A modern visit to the Eagle’s Nest begins at Obersalzberg. This is where the car parks and the stop for the distinctive red buses are located. These buses carry visitors higher up the mountain, although not directly to the Eagle’s Nest itself. The entire operation is remarkably efficient and feels like a well-organised tourist attraction. Visitors are assigned to a specific bus before departure. The journey then continues along a narrow mountain road carved into the rocky slopes. The road leads to the entrance of a tunnel driven deep into the mountain beneath the Kehlstein. At the end of the tunnel stands an elevator, which carries visitors directly up into the Eagle’s Nest. Even today, reaching the building is designed as a sequence of stages rather than a simple journey from one point to another.

It is easy to forget, however, that the place where the journey begins is historically far more significant than the car park or the bus terminal itself. It was here that the true centre of the entire Nazi mountain complex was located. Today, this is difficult to imagine, as most of the original buildings have disappeared and the landscape has largely been returned to a more natural state. The real heart of Nazi power on Obersalzberg was not the Eagle’s Nest high above the mountains, but the vast complex that once stood below it.

During the 1930s, this area was gradually transformed into a restricted zone reserved for the highest ranks of the Third Reich. The process began after Hitler developed a fondness for the region and made it one of his favourite places to stay. As his political influence grew, more and more properties were purchased, existing buildings were remodelled, and extensive infrastructure was created for the Nazi elite. Residences, administrative buildings, barracks, bunkers, and the technical facilities required to support the complex were all constructed here. As a result, Obersalzberg became far more than a mountain resort. It evolved into an informal centre of power visited by leading figures of the Third Reich as well as foreign dignitaries. It was here that the Berghof – Hitler’s principal residence – was located, alongside the homes of other senior Nazi officials. By the late 1930s, Obersalzberg had become not simply a retreat in the Alps, but one of the most important centres of power in Nazi Germany.

It was at the Berghof residence that Hitler stayed during his visits to the Alps. He received foreign guests there, held political discussions, and spent much of his time away from Berlin. Many of the well-known photographs showing him against an Alpine backdrop were taken at the Berghof rather than at the Eagle’s Nest. The residence was designed for everyday use. It contained private apartments, guest accommodation, offices, and all the facilities required to support political activity. While the Eagle’s Nest became the symbol, the Berghof was the place where daily life and political business actually took place.

After the war, the Berghof was partially destroyed by Allied bombing and subsequently fell into further decline. In the 1950s, its remaining ruins were deliberately demolished to prevent the site from becoming a place of pilgrimage for Nazi sympathisers. Today, very little remains of the building, and most visitors to the area are unaware of how close they are to what was once Hitler’s actual residence. This is one of the reasons why the Eagle’s Nest is so often mistaken for his home. The Berghof disappeared, while the Kehlsteinhaus survived. As a result, it gradually assumed the symbolic role of representing the Nazi presence in the Alps, even though its historical function was entirely different.

Only when viewed against the backdrop of this vast complex does the role of the Eagle’s Nest become clear. The Kehlsteinhaus was intended to be its most spectacular element, but not its most important one. The Eagle’s Nest was designed to impress, not to serve as the centre of power. So what exactly was it? If it was not Hitler’s main residence, what purpose did it actually serve?

The Kehlsteinhaus was built as a ceremonial pavilion intended for meetings, entertaining guests, and short visits. It is often referred to as Hitler’s Tea House and, although that description is somewhat simplified, it captures the character of the building quite well. It was never designed as a place for everyday living. Instead, it was conceived as an exceptional space high above Obersalzberg where guests could be received, meetings could be held, or a few hours could be spent in extraordinary surroundings.

Even the layout of the interior alone makes it clear that this was not a residence in the conventional sense. There are no extensive private apartments, numerous bedrooms, or the facilities required for long-term occupation. Instead, the building consists of a handful of representative rooms, a dining room, kitchen facilities, and a series of terraces designed to take advantage of the location and its views. Interestingly, Hitler himself did not make extensive use of it. Although the building was created as a gift for him, historical sources indicate that he visited it relatively infrequently.

The building was conceived as a symbol of prestige, technological achievement, and political power. Its construction required enormous resources, effort, and engineering expertise. A mountain road was built for it. A tunnel was driven through solid rock. An elevator was installed inside the mountain itself. The most impressive aspect of the Eagle’s Nest is not the building itself, but the fact that it was constructed in such a location at all. Work began in 1937, and time was short. The project had to be completed in time for Hitler’s fiftieth birthday in 1939. The greatest challenge was not the construction of the building itself, but the creation of the infrastructure needed to reach an altitude of more than 1,800 metres.

The first stage was the construction of the Kehlstein Road. In the 1930s, building it was a major engineering undertaking. The road was carved into the steep mountainside and required the construction of numerous retaining walls, culverts, and tunnels. In many places, workers operated on near-vertical rock faces. Harsh weather conditions, steep slopes, and an extremely tight schedule made the project exceptionally ambitious from the very beginning. The challenge was not simply to build a structure on a mountain, but to create a way of reaching it.

Once the road had been completed, another problem emerged. Even its highest point still lay more than one hundred metres below the planned location of the building. Rather than extending the road all the way to the summit, the planners opted for a far more dramatic solution. A tunnel was cut through the rock, leading to an elevator that carried visitors directly up to the Kehlsteinhaus. The elevator climbed approximately 124 metres and was designed to impress from the outset. It was not merely a practical means of transport. It formed part of the entire experience of visiting the Eagle’s Nest.

It is worth remembering that the project also served a propagandistic purpose. The Third Reich was eager to present major infrastructure projects as evidence of its modernity and organisational efficiency. The Eagle’s Nest fitted perfectly into that narrative. The goal was not simply to create a meeting place high in the mountains. It was also to demonstrate that the state could master even the most challenging terrain and complete a project that many would have considered impossible. What impresses most is not its size, but the road, the tunnel, and the elevator leading to a structure perched just below the mountain summit. These engineering achievements are what continue to make the Eagle’s Nest one of the most remarkable architectural and construction projects associated with the era of the Third Reich.

Today, reaching the Eagle’s Nest is surprisingly straightforward. The bus slowly climbs higher and higher, following a series of switchbacks and passing through tunnels and sections of road carved directly into the mountainside. Eventually, it stops beside a rock face at an altitude of around 1,700 metres above sea level. From there, visitors enter a tunnel approximately 120 metres long, cut deep into the mountain itself. At the end of the tunnel stands the famous elevator. Today it is primarily a tourist attraction, but when it was built it was one of the most luxurious elements of the entire complex. Lined with polished brass, the cabin rises approximately 124 metres, carrying visitors vertically through the heart of the mountain to the level of the Kehlsteinhaus. Guests did not simply arrive at the building. First they travelled along a spectacular mountain road. Then they passed through a tunnel cut into solid rock. Finally, they ascended through the mountain itself by elevator. Only then did they reach the Eagle’s Nest. The entire sequence was designed to create a sense of exclusivity and anticipation before visitors even crossed the threshold.

The Eagle’s Nest building itself is relatively small. It does not resemble a palace, a sprawling residence, or a monumental complex. In reality, it consists of just a handful of principal rooms and terraces arranged across different levels. It is not actually located on the summit of the mountain. The building stands at an altitude of 1,834 metres above sea level, while the true summit of the Kehlstein rises several dozen metres higher. On a clear day, this would probably be impossible to miss. A flight of stone steps leads upward from one of the terraces, allowing visitors to continue to the summit itself. That day, however, conditions were very different. The clouds completely obscured the surroundings and the steps seemed to disappear into a wall of white. I could see people climbing upwards, but not where they were going. After a few metres, they simply dissolved into the mist.

This location reveals a great deal about the thinking behind the project. The goal was not to place the building on the highest point of the mountain. What mattered far more was finding a site where the structure could be built safely, where a road could reach it, where a tunnel could be driven through the rock, and where an elevator could be installed. Practical engineering considerations ultimately mattered more than the symbolic appeal of occupying the highest point on the mountain.

With the mist around, I had the distinct sensation that the building was suspended somewhere outside ordinary space between rock and cloud, existing almost outside the normal landscape altogether. There were no points of reference, no valleys, and no neighbouring peaks. There were only rocks, cloud, and a building clinging to the mountainside. Only later did it occur to me that this sense of isolation was probably part of the original concept. The Kehlsteinhaus was meant to feel exceptional, separated from the everyday world below.

One of the most surprising aspects of visiting the Eagle’s Nest is its present-day normality. After all the history connected with the Third Reich, after the road carved into the rock, the tunnel, the elevator, and the awareness of why this building was created, you simply arrive at a restaurant. People eat lunch, drink coffee, rest after the journey, and take photographs. We also sat down at a table and ordered a beer. There was no atmosphere of a museum or a memorial site here. Nor was there any attempt to build legends. In itself, there would have been nothing unusual about that, were it not for the awareness of where we were. It was difficult not to feel a certain ambivalence. In Germany, many sites directly associated with Hitler were destroyed after the war or deliberately stripped of their original function. The Berghof did not survive. Much of the former complex on Obersalzberg disappeared as well. The Kehlsteinhaus remained, but its meaning changed completely. Sitting there with a beer, watching tourists sheltering from the cloud, I felt that this was the greatest paradox of the Eagle’s Nest. It was built as a symbol of prestige and power, yet today it functions as an ordinary restaurant visited by people from all over the world.

Because the mountains remained completely hidden by cloud that day, my attention gradually shifted from the landscape to the building itself. The entire premises follow a terraced layout shaped by the slope of the mountain. The individual spaces occupy different elevations and are connected by short flights of stairs. As a result, moving through the building means constantly ascending or descending, even though the level changes themselves are relatively modest. The highest level contains the former dining room and the kitchen facilities. This is where visitors emerge from the elevator. It is also where the toilets and the main circulation route through the building are located. The windows of the former dining room overlook the Sonnenterrasse (Sun Terrace), situated on a lower level. From the dining room, a staircase leads down to the Great Hall with its fireplace, then further down to the small sitting room now commonly known as Eva Braun’s Room, and finally to the Sonnenterrasse itself. The room known today as Eva Braun’s Room is actually the Scharitzkehlzimmer, but the association with Eva Braun appears so frequently that it has become firmly established in popular descriptions of the Eagle’s Nest. Compared with the Great Hall, it feels surprisingly intimate. I would estimate its size at perhaps fifteen or twenty square metres.

Leaving the elevator did not only provide access to the dining room. On the opposite side, visitors could step directly outside onto an open terrace running around part of the building. This was not the Sonnenterrasse, but a higher outdoor platform protected by a low stone wall. It is from here that the most famous views of the Alps unfold on a clear day. The more I explored the building, the more it became clear that it had been designed around movement, views, and the experience of the mountain itself.

If there is one interior that can be regarded as the symbol of the Eagle’s Nest, it is undoubtedly the Great Hall. It appears in most photographs of the building and is the room that most visitors remember. The most distinctive feature of the space is, of course, the monumental fireplace made of red marble. It was presented to Hitler by Benito Mussolini and remains one of the most recognisable elements of the building’s interior. It is here that the contrast between the historical image of the Eagle’s Nest and its present-day reality is most apparent. Today, tourists pass through the hall, take photographs, and move on after a few minutes. Originally, however, the room was intended as a representative space for meetings and conversation.

It was here that I first began to realise that the building’s modern appearance differs slightly from that how it looked in the past. The Great Hall itself remains largely unchanged. The relationship between Eva Braun’s Room and the Sonnenterrasse, however, was altered when the terrace was later enclosed with glass. Today, the Sonnenterrasse resembles a long glazed gallery running alongside the building. Walking through it for the first time, one might assume that its primary purpose is circulation. Yet in this case my memory had not deceived me. For some reason, I remembered the space as a terrace furnished with deckchairs. Historical photographs I found later in the internet confirmed that impression. There is no glass in those images. There is no enclosed gallery. Instead, open arcades face directly towards the mountains. Light pours into the interior. Deckchairs stand against the walls.

One question kept returning to me throughout the visit: why does this building still exist at all? After all, many places directly associated with Hitler and the highest ranks of the Third Reich did not survive the war, or were deliberately destroyed afterwards. The Berghof, which for years had been the true centre of life on Obersalzberg, is a good example. Today, only fragments of its foundations and a handful of traces hidden in the forest remain.

The Kehlsteinhaus, however, followed a somewhat different path. Its future was also debated after the war, but in the end the building survived. Several factors may have contributed to that decision. It was not Hitler’s principal residence. It never played the political role that the Berghof did. Hitler himself visited relatively infrequently. At the same time, the building was an extraordinary architectural and engineering achievement, and its location made it easy to adapt to a new purpose. Over time, it became both a restaurant and a tourist destination. The history did not disappear, but it ceased to dominate. Germany consciously separated these two worlds. Historical education became centred on the Documentation Centre at Obersalzberg, while the Eagle’s Nest itself continued to function primarily as a tourist attraction. As a result, the building never became either a shrine or a monument to the Nazi past, although it can never be completely detached from the circumstances of its creation.

As we travelled back down the mountain by bus, the clouds slowly began to break apart. Small fragments of the landscape appeared. Individual peaks and valleys emerged from the mist. The mountains that had been invisible at the summit gradually returned. The Eagle’s Nest, however, remained hidden high above them, still immersed in cloud.

The Eagle’s Nest in the Clouds. When the View Disappears

Großer Arber. Above the Forests of Bavaria and Šumava

For several days our base is Železná Ruda, a small town on the Czech-German border. From there we set out each day to explore different parts of the Šumava region and the surrounding mountains. Throughout our stay, one landmark seemed to accompany us wherever we went – Großer Arber. The longer we spent in the region, the more often the mountain appeared on the horizon. Sometimes it dominated the view. At other times it emerged only briefly above the endless forests. Yet it was impossible to ignore.

Our yesterday visit to Großer Arber was only one part of a much longer journey. After exploring western Bohemia and spending time in the forests of Šumava, we plan to continue south towards Salzburg and the Bavarian Alps. Even so, this mountain attracted our attention from the very beginning of the trip. Having seen it repeatedly from roads, viewpoints and village streets on both sides of the border, it felt only natural that sooner or later we should make our way to the summit and discover the region from above.

Rising to 1,456 metres above sea level, Großer Arber is the highest peak in the Bavarian Forest. Known in Czech as Velký Javor (Great Maple), it differs markedly from the dramatic, jagged summits associated with the Alps. Rather than culminating in a narrow rocky peak, Großer Arber forms a broad, open ridge. This gives the summit area a spacious feel and allows visitors to move easily between viewpoints while enjoying the surrounding landscape at a more relaxed pace.

To understand the significance of Großer Arber, it helps to look beyond the mountain itself and consider the wider landscape in which it stands. The Bavarian Forest in Germany and Šumava in the Czech Republic are not two separate mountain ranges but different parts of the same vast forested region stretching along the border between the two countries. For centuries, these mountains formed a natural frontier, covered by dense woodland and scattered settlements. Today, although the international border still runs through the area, the landscape remains remarkably continuous. Forested ridges, valleys and mountain slopes extend across both countries with little regard for political boundaries. The region is also home to two neighbouring national parks – Bavarian Forest National Park in Germany and Šumava National Park in the Czech Republic. Together they protect one of the largest continuous woodland areas in Central Europe, creating a landscape that feels far more defined by nature than by the line drawn on a map.

Reaching the summit could hardly have been easier. Like many popular destinations in Bavaria, Großer Arber is supported by excellent visitor infrastructure, making it accessible to a wide range of travellers rather than only experienced hikers. From the lower station, small six-person gondola cabins carry visitors up the mountainside through the forest. The journey itself offers increasingly expansive views of the surrounding landscape before arriving just below the summit. From there, only a short walk is required to reach the highest parts of the mountain. As elsewhere in Bavaria, the tourist infrastructure on Großer Arber is exceptionally well organised. Visitors who prefer not to undertake a strenuous hike can reach the upper part of the mountain by cable car, while those who wish to spend more time outdoors will find a network of well-maintained walking paths and viewpoints around the summit. Facilities are thoughtfully integrated into the landscape. Restaurants, refreshment stops, seating areas and public conveniences make it easy to spend several hours on the mountain without feeling rushed.

The mountain invites visitors to linger. Rather than gathering around a single viewpoint, people spread out across the broad summit ridge, following paths that lead in different directions and reveal new perspectives of the surrounding landscape. While the distant views naturally draw attention, I found myself equally interested in the details of the summit itself. Rocky outcrops emerge from the ground in unexpected places, patches of mountain vegetation cling to the exposed terrain, and here and there visitors have balanced small cairns from loose stones.

We were fortunate with the weather on the day of our visit. After encountering less favourable conditions elsewhere during the trip, it was a pleasure to find clear skies, good visibility and enough sunshine to fully appreciate the views from the mountain. The summit offers far-reaching panoramas across the forests of the Bavarian Forest and Šumava, whose endless ridges seem to stretch towards the horizon in every direction. Looking out across this landscape, it becomes easy to appreciate the scale of the region and the vast extent of its woodland cover. The Alps were also visible in the distance. The morning light and a slight haze softened their outlines, giving them an almost ethereal appearance on the horizon. Although the conditions were not perfect, it was still possible to pick out the distant mountain chain. Local visitors told us that on exceptionally clear afternoons the Alpine panorama can be even more impressive.

One of the most distinctive features of Großer Arber is the pair of white radar domes that crown the summit. Visible from considerable distances across both Germany and the Czech Republic, they make the mountain instantly recognisable. The domes are a reminder that Großer Arber was valued not only for its scenery but also for its strategic location. During the Cold War, the summit hosted military radar installations, taking advantage of the mountain’s commanding position and extensive views across Central Europe. For decades, the site played a role in monitoring air traffic and military activity during a period when the nearby border formed part of the divide between East and West.

For readers unfamiliar with European history, the Cold War was the decades-long political and military rivalry between the Western democracies led by the United States and the communist states led by the Soviet Union. At the time, Großer Arber stood in West Germany, a member of NATO, while neighbouring Czechoslovakia belonged to the Soviet-backed Warsaw Pact. The nearby border formed part of the Iron Curtain, the heavily fortified line that divided much of Europe until the collapse of communist regimes in 1989.

The decision to build the radar station was controversial. Conservationists objected to the construction of large military structures on one of the most prominent peaks in the Bavarian Forest, while military planners regarded the summit as an ideal location for monitoring airspace beyond the Iron Curtain. Construction began in the late 1970s, and the facility entered service in 1983 at a time when tensions between NATO and the Warsaw Pact remained high. From this elevated position, radar operators could monitor aircraft movements across a large area of Central Europe. The station was operated by the West German Air Force and formed part of NATO’s air-defence network, providing surveillance and early warning coverage along one of the alliance’s eastern frontiers.

The end of the Cold War did not bring an end to the station’s importance. Instead, the facility was modernised and incorporated into the Integrated NATO Air Defence System. In the mid-1990s, new radar equipment was installed, allowing the station to continue its role in airspace surveillance. Today, one of the domes houses a long-range radar system, while the other contains communications equipment used for military operations. The installation remains operational and is currently run by the German Air Force. As a result, the white domes that dominate the summit are not merely historical curiosities. Although they have become an accepted part of the mountain’s silhouette, they remain active elements of Germany’s and NATO’s air-defence infrastructure.

Rather than taking the cable car back down, we decided to return on foot. The descent is not particularly long – around forty minutes in our case – but it is steep enough in places to remind you that you are coming down a mountain rather than strolling through a park. The route passes through attractive forest scenery, with moss-covered ground, exposed roots, rocky sections and occasional stretches of wider gravel paths. After spending time on the open summit ridge, it was pleasant to find ourselves once again surrounded by trees and immersed in the landscape that defines both the Bavarian Forest and neighbouring Šumava. Along the way we also encountered mountain bikers, another reminder of how well the area caters for different types of visitors. Dedicated cycling routes help keep riders and walkers apart, allowing both groups to enjoy the mountain safely and comfortably without getting in one another’s way.

Looking back, Großer Arber proved to be far more than a viewpoint overlooking the surrounding countryside. The combination of easy access, extensive views, attractive walking routes and excellent facilities makes it one of the most rewarding destinations in the region. Whether arriving for the panoramas, the forests, the history or simply a day outdoors, it is easy to understand why the mountain remains one of the Bavarian Forest’s most popular attractions.

Großer Arber. Above the Forests of Bavaria and Šumava

German Potato and Sausage Eintopf

German Eintopf with potatoes, onions and sausage is a simple, hearty one-pot dish whose flavour is built gradually, beginning with sautéed onions and sausage and ending with gentle simmering in broth. Although similar dishes exist in Poland – something like a peasant’s pot – they were never part of my family’s cooking tradition. I first discovered this type of meal during my longer stays in Germany. That is where I learned how to cook it. Only later did I realise that very similar rustic dishes are also known in my own country.

The word Eintopf literally means one pot, referring to meals in which all ingredients are cooked together in a single pot and served as a complete meal. This style of cooking developed from practical household traditions, where simplicity, nourishment, and the ability to feed many people from inexpensive ingredients were essential.

Potatoes became widespread in Central Europe in the eighteenth century and quickly turned into one of the most important staple foods in Germany. When combined with vegetables and sausages – another defining element of German food culture – they formed the base of many rustic stews eaten by farmers, workers, and families throughout the country. Across Germany, similar dishes appear under names such as Kartoffelsuppe or Kartoffeleintopf. The exact ingredients vary from region to region. In northern parts of the country, smoked sausages are often used and the flavour is heartier and more robust, while southern versions can be lighter and more broth-based. Despite these variations, the essence of the dish remains the same: a comforting, warming stew built around potatoes, sausage, and simple vegetables.

Today, potato and sausage eintopf is especially popular during colder months.

The ingredients for about 4 servings are:

  • 700–800 g potatoes
  • 2 medium onions
  • 350–400 g smoked sausage
  • about 1 litre broth (vegetable or meat)
  • 2 bay leaves
  • ½–1 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper
  • salt to taste (carefully, because the broth may already be salty)
  • a small handful of fresh parsley
  • (optionally) ½ teaspoon marjoram

The first step is to prepare all the ingredients. Peel the potatoes and cut them into medium-sized cubes, about 1.5–2 cm, so that after cooking they are soft but still hold their shape. Slice the sausage into fairly thick rounds so the pieces remain clearly noticeable in the finished dish. Peel the onions and dice them finely. Fresh parsley can be chopped at the beginning and set aside, as it will only be added at the very end.

In a large, heavy pot, ideally cast iron or another thick-bottomed pot, start by sautéing the onions. Place the pot over medium heat and add a small amount of fat, or simply rely on the fat that will later render from the sausage. Add the diced onions and cook them for a few minutes, stirring with a wooden spoon, until they become soft and translucent. The onions should soften and turn glossy but should not brown, as browning would make the flavour too intense for this dish.

Once the onions are ready, add the sliced sausage to the pot. Let it cook together with the onions for several minutes. During this time the sausage begins to lightly brown and releases its fat and aroma, which combine with the onions and create the flavour base of the entire eintopf. Stir from time to time so that the sausage browns evenly and nothing sticks to the bottom of the pot.

Add the diced potatoes to this aromatic base. Pour them directly into the pot and mix them thoroughly with the onions and sausage. Let them cook together briefly for a minute or two so the potatoes warm up slightly and absorb some of the flavour already present in the pot. At this stage add the seasonings: the bay leaves, freshly ground black pepper, and a small amount of salt. Salt should be added cautiously because the broth that will be poured in next may already contain salt, so it is better to adjust the seasoning fully at the end of cooking.

Next pour in the broth. The liquid should cover the ingredients by roughly two to three centimetres so the dish remains thick and hearty rather than becoming a thin soup. After adding the broth, stir gently and bring everything to a boil. When the eintopf begins to bubble, let it cook briefly without a lid so that you can easily control the heat.

Once the dish reaches a steady boil, place the lid on the pot but leave it slightly ajar. The eintopf should simmer gently over low heat for about twenty to thirty minutes. During this time the potatoes soften, and some of them begin to break down slightly, naturally thickening the broth. This is what gives eintopf its characteristic texture – rich and substantial, more like a stew than a soup.

Toward the end of cooking, taste the dish and adjust the seasoning with salt or pepper if needed. Remove the bay leaves from the pot, as they have already released their aroma. Finally add the chopped fresh parsley and stir it gently into the stew.

Serve the finished eintopf in deep bowls while it is still hot. It is traditionally eaten with a spoon and accompanied by thick slices of rustic bread, preferably sourdough or a mixed rye-wheat loaf. The bread is perfect for soaking up the rich, thick broth left in the bowl.

Guten Appetit!

You may also like the recipes for: French Onion Soup, Lithuanian Cold Beet Soup, French Beef Bourguignon, East European Solyanka or New Zealand Chowder.

German Potato and Sausage Eintopf