St Peter’s Basilica Vatican. What You Should Know Before You Go

St Peter’s Basilica is one of those places where, no matter how many times you visit, there is always something new to discover – some detail you missed before. The last time I was there, I gave myself over two, perhaps even three hours just to wander, taking photographs, circling around again and again. I’ve already written a few posts focusing on particular sculptures that caught my attention, each time finding something worth reflecting on. In the meantime, I also had the chance to visit Istanbul, and to step inside Hagia Sophia – so I do have something to compare it with, although admittedly much of Hagia Sophia’s former splendour has not survived. Now, it’s finally time for a proper post dedicated to St Peter’s Basilica itself.

St Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican was constructed above the tomb of the Apostle Peter, one of the twelve disciples of Jesus and, according to tradition, the first pope. Peter, a Galilean fisherman, became His disciple and close companion after encountering Jesus. Jesus of Nazareth, a first-century Jewish teacher and preacher, is regarded in Christian tradition as the Messiah and the Son of God. His teachings form the foundation of Catholicism, which has evolved over the centuries, notably through the interpretation of His words and actions within Church tradition.

According to historical accounts, Peter was crucified in Rome around AD 64, during the reign of Emperor Nero, amidst one of the earliest waves of Christian persecution. The immediate backdrop to these events was the Great Fire of Rome. Although the true cause of the fire remains unknown, the Roman historian Tacitus records that Christians were blamed by Nero. Their refusal to participate in imperial and pagan cults was perceived as a threat to public order. Condemned Christians perished in the arenas, in the flames of pyres, and on crosses. According to tradition, Peter requested to be crucified head downwards, believing himself unworthy to die in the same manner as Jesus.

After the execution, Peter’s body was reportedly buried in a cemetery along the Via Cornelia, at the site where the Basilica now stands. In the 20th century, during archaeological excavations beneath the Basilica, a complex of tombs was discovered, which has been identified as the site of Peter’s burial. Today, his grave may be viewed as part of the so-called Scavi Tour, guided visits conducted for small groups by prior reservation. Photography and filming are forbidden benath and appropriate dress is required. The entry is limited to visitors aged 15 and above.

The St Peter’s Basilica we know today was constructed on the site of an earlier church known as Old St Peter’s Basilica, which was erected in the 4th century at the initiative of Emperor Constantine the Great. He was the first Roman emperor to legalise Christianity and to begin establishing public places of Christian worship. In AD 313, he issued the so-called Edict of Milan, which granted freedom of religion and enabled Christian communities to operate without fear of persecution.

Constantine commissioned the construction of a basilica above the tomb of the Apostle Peter – a location that was already recognised as a site of pilgrimage. The Old St Peter’s Basilica followed a traditional longitudinal basilica layout with five aisles – a wide central nave flanked by two narrower aisles on each side, separated by rows of marble columns. At the entrance stood a spacious atrium, known as the Paradise, featuring a central fountain for ritual ablutions, leading into the church through a narthex. The structure had no transept, and its orientation was purely linear, culminating in a large semicircular apse that housed the bishop’s throne and clergy seating. The high altar was positioned directly above the tomb of St Peter, which could be accessed via the confessio, a sunken space that allowed pilgrims to approach the apostle’s grave. Over time, the Basilica was embellished with mosaics, reliquaries, and imperial offerings, transforming it into a richly decorated liturgical and devotional space.

For more than 1,200 years, this structure served as a significant liturgical and symbolic centre of Western Christianity. While Old St Peter’s Basilica became the liturgical heart of Western Christianity, the centre of Eastern Christianity was the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople, also originally commissioned by Emperor Constantine.

The Old Basilica functioned for many centuries as a site of papal liturgies, coronations, and pilgrimages, but over time it fell into serious disrepair, due both to the passage of time and the lack of systematic maintenance. In the second half of the 15th century, discussions began concerning its restoration. However, Pope Julius II, judging the building’s poor structural condition and the evolving liturgical needs of the Church, ultimately decided to demolish it entirely and construct a new church in its place.

This decision was controversial – many believed the historic structure should be preserved. Ultimately, however, the vision of creating a New Basilica reflecting Renaissance ideals of harmony and grandeur prevailed. The demolition of the Old Basilica began gradually, while at the same time foundations were laid for the new one. The tomb of St Peter was never disturbed, and it remained the focal point of the new basilica as well.

The construction of the new St Peter’s Basilica began on 18 April 1506, at the behest of Pope Julius II, who sought to erect a church that would meet the liturgical and aesthetic demands of the time. The works continued for over 120 years, involving multiple design phases and numerous conceptual changes – reflecting both the development of architectural thought and the succession of different popes.

The first architect entrusted with the project was Donato Bramante, who proposed a centralised plan based on a Greek cross, crowned by a monumental dome at the intersection of the arms. This Greek cross layout, with four arms of equal length, was symbolic of perfect symmetry and balance, reflecting Renaissance ideals and diverging from the traditional Latin cross plan with its elongated nave. After his death, the work was taken up successively by Raphael, Antonio da Sangallo the Younger, and Baldassare Peruzzi, each introducing numerous modifications and new ideas. Despite stylistic differences, they all retained the centralised layout as the foundation of the composition.

A turning point came in 1546, when Michelangelo, then aged 71, assumed supervision of the construction. Although he preserved the overall concept of a centralised plan, he simplified earlier designs and gave the building a more cohesive and monumental character. The most defining feature of his contribution was the dome, the lower section of which was completed during his lifetime. The upper part, along with its crowning lantern, was finished after his death, under the direction of Giacomo della Porta and Domenico Fontana.

In the following decades, the Basilica’s layout underwent a significant transformation. Carlo Maderno, working under Pope Paul V, extended the nave, thereby modifying the original Greek cross plan into a Latin cross. Whereas the Greek cross features arms of equal length, the Latin cross is characterised by a longer vertical axis – a more traditional and longitudinal structure that emphasised processional movement and hierarchical space. Maderno also designed the current façade, completed in 1614, which faces St Peter’s Square. Gian Lorenzo Bernini, involved in the final phase of the project, was responsible for, among other elements, the bronze baldachin above the main altar and the iconic colonnade that embraces the square.

St Peter’s Basilica measures 187 metres in length and 58 metres across the central nave, with a total floor area exceeding 15,000 square metres. Its vast interior can accommodate up to 60,000 people. What sets it apart from other churches is not only its sheer scale, but also its remarkable attention to proportion, light, and materials.

The dome of the Basilica, designed by Michelangelo, reaches a height of 136 metres from the floor to the cross and is visible from many points across Rome. Its internal diameter measures approximately 42 metres, making it one of the largest domes in the world, comparable in scale to that of the Pantheon. The dome rests upon a massive drum pierced with windows, which allow light to enter and create a sense of vertical rhythm within the space.

The interior of the Basilica does not contain traditional paintings on canvas or plaster. What may appear from a distance to be painted images are, in fact, mosaics, composed of millions of tiny, coloured tesserae arranged with extraordinary precision. These mosaics depict biblical scenes, saints, and ornamental motifs. Their use was also practical: in the damp and often chilly interior, mosaics are more durable than traditional frescoes or oil paintings.

The entire interior is governed by a strong sense of axial alignment and symmetry. The central nave draws the eye directly towards the Confessio of St Peter – the site traditionally believed to house his tomb. The main altar, surmounted by Bernini’s bronze baldachin, stands precisely above this sacred point. The regular rhythm of columns, coffered ceilings, and niches containing sculptures creates a modular structure, helping visitors navigate the space and lending a measured cadence to the vast interior.

The Basilica’s two most prominent altars – the Papal Altar beneath Bernini’s bronze baldachin and the Altar of the Chair of Saint Peter at the far end of the nave – serve distinct liturgical and symbolic purposes. The Papal Altar, also known as the Altar of the Confession, is located directly above the tomb of Saint Peter, at the crossing of the Basilica’s main axis. It is surmounted by Gian Lorenzo Bernini’s monumental bronze canopy, commissioned by Pope Urban VIII in the 17th century. This altar holds unique status: only the pope may celebrate Mass at it, or a priest explicitly authorised to do so. It is the true liturgical heart of the Basilica, marking the physical and spiritual centre of the Catholic Church. In contrast, the Altar of the Chair, situated in the apse, is a theological and symbolic focal point. It houses the Cathedra Petri – a relic believed to be the wooden throne of Saint Peter – enshrined within Bernini’s baroque sculptural masterpiece, completed in 1666. Though rarely used for liturgical celebrations, this altar embodies the continuity of apostolic succession and the teaching authority of the papacy.

The Basilica’s interior is crafted primarily from marble, sourced from across Italy and the former Roman Empire. Decorative materials also include bronze, gilding, and a variety of precious and semi-precious stones. Many of these elements are spolia, repurposed from the ruins of ancient Roman buildings, lending the structure both material richness and historical continuity.

Despite its dominant sacred function, the Basilica also serves as a museum-like space, housing a wealth of artworks of exceptional historical and artistic value. These include monumental papal tombs and the already mentioned baldachin by Bernini. The result is a complex architectural and artistic ensemble, in which liturgical, symbolic, and touristic functions intertwine on a daily basis.

Although St Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican is the most well-known Catholic church and the site of many major liturgical events, it is not officially the pope’s cathedral. The cathedral of the Bishop of Rome, and thus the principal church of the Diocese of Rome, is the Archbasilica of St John Lateran (Archibasilica Sanctissimi Salvatoris), located in the southeastern part of Rome, outside the boundaries of Vatican City.

It is the Lateran, not the Vatican, that is the oldest papal seat and the true mother church of Catholicism – it even bears the title “Mother and Head of all the Churches in the City and the World”. The Lateran Basilica has served as the cathedral of the Bishop of Rome since the 4th century, and it is there that the cathedra, or episcopal throne, symbolising papal pastoral authority, is found.

In practice, however, the pope most often celebrates liturgy at St Peter’s Basilica, as it is located at the heart of the Vatican, is far larger, more accessible to pilgrims, and closely associated with the figure of St Peter. Nevertheless, in canonical and administrative terms, it is the Lateran Basilica that remains his official cathedral.

This fact often surprises visitors to the Vatican, particularly those from outside Europe, where St Peter’s Basilica is widely assumed to be the pope’s main church and residence. In reality, this is the result of the historical development of the Church’s presence in Rome, and a legacy of the ancient urban structure of the city.

Early Christianity in Rome was centred not in the Vatican, but in the Lateran, where the first official papal complex was built on land donated to the Church by Emperor Constantine. For many centuries, the Lateran served as the administrative and liturgical centre of the Roman Church. Only in the 14th century, after the popes returned from Avignon, did the Vatican gain prominence as the papal residence, and St Peter’s Basilica gradually became the main setting for public ceremonies.

Today, although the papal apartments, the offices of the Roman Curia, and the principal stage for global religious events are all located in the Vatican, the legal status of the cathedral has never changed. It is in the Basilica of St John Lateran that the pope is formally installed as Bishop of Rome, and it is there that the cathedra, the symbolic bishop’s throne, is found. For this reason, Lateran remains the most important church in canonical order.

St Peter’s Basilica Vatican. What You Should Know Before You Go

Pius XII. Pope of the Warfare Time and Harsh Politics

St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican is both a place of pilgrimage and a major tourist destination — the most prominent Catholic church in the world. Like many sacred buildings, it holds an extensive collection of artworks. Among them are sculptures and mosaics which, from a distance, resemble paintings but are in fact intricate compositions made of tiny glass tesserae. Each carries its own meaning. Many of the statues commemorate saints and popes — names largely unfamiliar to me.

I moved slowly through the basilica, reading inscriptions, taking photographs, trying to make sense of what I saw. But without a deeper familiarity with Catholic history, I often found myself unable to place these figures in their historical roles. One in particular, however, stood out — both in posture and significance: Pope Pius XII, whose papacy unfolded during some of the most turbulent decades of the 20th century.

Pope Pius XII, born Eugenio Maria Giuseppe Giovanni Pacelli (1876–1958), served as head of the Catholic Church from 1939 until his death in 1958. His pontificate was notable not only for its length, but for the turbulent historical period it encompassed — including the rise of Benito Mussolini, the events of World War II, and the early years of the Cold War.

Before ascending to the papacy, Pacelli had already been a major figure in Vatican diplomacy, serving as Cardinal Secretary of State. In that role, he was deeply involved in negotiating the Lateran Pacts of 1929, signed under Pope Pius XI with then Italian Prime Minister Benito Mussolini. These agreements marked a legal, financial, and religious realignment between the Catholic Church and the Italian state, following decades of estrangement.

The Lateran Pacts consisted of three components. First, a political treaty established Vatican City as a sovereign state. Second, a financial convention provided compensation from the Italian government to the Holy See for the loss of the Papal States — including both a lump sum and a perpetual annuity. Third, a Concordat regulated the relationship between Church and State. It declared Catholicism the state religion of Italy, defined the legal and civil status of clergy, and introduced religious education into the national school system.

This settlement ended the so-called Roman Question — a conflict that had remained unresolved since the unification of Italy in 1870. It was not merely a religious agreement, but also a recognition of the Church as a political actor in modern Europe.

During Pius XII’s lifetime, Italy was under Fascist rule, and the European balance of power was rapidly disintegrating. His early papacy coincided with the signing of the Nazi–Soviet Pact, the invasion of Poland, and the outbreak of the Second World War. Already serving as Cardinal Secretary of State, and now as pope, Pius XII was faced with the challenge of responding to Mussolini’s Fascist policies, many of which stood in direct contradiction to Catholic doctrine. These included Italy’s entry into the war and the introduction of racial laws, which imposed legal discrimination and aligned the regime more closely with Nazi ideology. What had begun as a career shaped by diplomacy was now overtaken by the demands of navigating a world in which religious and ethical values were being systematically dismantled.

Pius XII took an approach of deliberate silence. He did not speak out publicly or unambiguously on the persecution of Jews, the crimes of the Nazi regime, or the actions of totalitarian governments. In official documents, speeches and homilies, he refrained from naming countries, nationalities, or specific acts of genocide. When he did refer to suffering or violence, he did so in general terms, without identifying the perpetrators. He did not speak plainly. One striking example was the deportation of over a thousand Roman Jews in October 1943. Arrested by Nazi forces and taken from the very city in which the Vatican stood, they were sent to Auschwitz. The pope did not issue a public protest. No official statement was released, and no mass held in their name. The silence at that moment has become one of the most cited — and contested — aspects of his wartime record.

This stance has been interpreted by some scholars as passive complicity, and by others as a strategic decision, intended to avoid exacerbating the situation — particularly for Catholics and Jews living in Nazi-occupied territories.

Although Pius XII remained silent in public, numerous actions indicate that he was involved in discreet humanitarian efforts behind the scenes. Under his authority, Catholic institutions across Europe — including monasteries, convents, seminaries, and Church-run schools — provided shelter to Jews, political refugees, and others at risk. In Rome alone, over 4,000 Jews are estimated to have been hidden within religious buildings during the Nazi occupation. Approximately 477 sought refuge within the Vatican itself or at the papal residence in Castel Gandolfo.

In addition to providing shelter, some Church institutions issued false baptismal certificates and other forged identity documents to help individuals evade arrest and deportation. These actions were often carried out discreetly by local clergy — sometimes with tacit Vatican approval, and in certain cases, reportedly under direct papal instruction. While the documentation remains fragmentary, some testimonies and post-war investigations suggest that Pius XII was informed of these efforts and, in specific instances, either authorised them verbally or allowed them to proceed without interference. In Rome, the network of safe houses expanded significantly during the German occupation, and the fact that Vatican City itself sheltered hundreds of Jews strongly indicates at least a top-level awareness, if not formal coordination.

Pius XII’s wartime policy remains the subject of ongoing historical scrutiny and debate. Interpretations vary depending on how his actions — or inactions — are assessed in light of the complex wartime context and the archival material that has become more accessible in recent years.

Under his leadership, the Vatican was required to navigate difficult moral ground: maintaining the recently recognised sovereignty of the Holy See, while also fulfilling the spiritual responsibilities of the papacy. His approach was defined by diplomatic caution and a consistent focus on practical humanitarian assistance, rather than public denunciation.

This strategy has drawn criticism from some historians, who view it as a failure to clearly condemn atrocities committed during the war. Others argue that it reflected a deliberate, constrained choice — shaped by the risks, the political realities of the time, and a belief that quiet intervention might achieve more than public confrontation.

In the end, Pius XII’s papacy stands as a case study in the use of silence — as a diplomatic tool, a moral posture, and a legacy that continues to challenge historical understanding. In that sense, Pius XII does not simply stand for what the Church did – or failed to do – during the war. He embodies a broader human dilemma: how to act when all options carry a cost. His legacy is not only about history, but about the present – a reminder that moral clarity often arrives only in hindsight.

Pius XII. Pope of the Warfare Time and Harsh Politics

Power plays of Pope Innocent III in Medieval Europe

The Basilica of Saint Peter in Rome is not only a magnificent building, but also a place where one can admire statues of popes. Here are a few words about another one of them, Pope Innocent III.

Pope Innocent III, whose real name was Lotario dei Conti di Segni was a very powerful and influential pope in the history of the Catholic Church. He had a good education in theology and law, and he worked in different administrative and church positions at the beginning of his career. He became pope on January 8, 1198, after Pope Celestine III died. His papacy ended with his death on July 16, 1216. He strongly believed in the authority of the pope and thought that the Church was more important than the rulers. He influenced many kings and leaders and often got involved in their conflicts and disagreements. Innocent III put heavy financial pressure on both the clergy and rulers. He made many official decisions, including starting the Fourth Crusade.

In 1205, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Hubert Walter, passed away, and the King of England, John Lackland, wanted to influence the selection of the new archbishop. However, Pope Innocent III insisted on the independence of the Church in such matters and asserted his authority to appoint the archbishop. When the cathedral chapter of Canterbury elected Stephen Langton as the new Archbishop in 1207 without the approval of King John, the king refused to accept Langton and seized the revenues of the archbishopric.

Pope Innocent III responded by placing England under interdict in 1208. An interdict is a censure by the Catholic Church, which suspends public worship services and the administration of certain sacraments. The aim was to pressure King John to submit to the Pope’s authority in ecclesiastical matters. The interdict had a significant impact on England, affecting the religious life of the people. The conflict escalated further, leading to King John’s excommunication in 1209. Eventually, in 1213, facing political and military challenges, King John submitted to the Pope, accepted Langton as Archbishop of Canterbury, and agreed to pay an annual tribute to the Papal See.

After Emperor Henry VI died in 1197, the Holy Roman Empire faced a period of instability called the Interregnum, with no clear successor to the throne. Different German princes and factions fought for power during this time. Pope Innocent III saw a chance to assert papal authority in choosing the new emperor. He first supported Philip of Swabia, Emperor Henry VI’s brother. But when Philip was killed in 1208, Innocent III switched his support to Otto IV, from the powerful Guelph family. Otto IV became Holy Roman Emperor in 1209 with the pope’s backing.

However, conflicts soon arose between Otto IV and Pope. One major issue was Otto’s failure to keep promises made to the papacy, including giving large territories to the Church. In 1210, Pope Innocent III excommunicated Otto IV for his perceived betrayal and failure to keep his promises. This strained the relationship between the Pope and the Emperor and had political consequences within the Holy Roman Empire. Even after being excommunicated, Otto IV ruled as emperor for some time. But the papal excommunication weakened his position, and eventually, internal conflicts and opposition from other German princes led to his removal in 1215. Frederick II, the son of Henry VI and a ward of Pope Innocent III, later became the next Holy Roman Emperor, ending the interregnum.

Innocent III’s involvement in the Fourth Crusade led to unintended consequences. The crusaders, facing financial difficulties, were unable to pay the Venetians for the transportation they provided. To settle their debts, Doge Enrico Dandolo proposed redirecting the campaign to Zara. The Venetians convinced the crusaders that capturing Zara would be justifiable due to the city’s rebellion against Venetian authority. Despite Zara being a Christian city, the crusaders attacked and besieged it in November 1202. Upon learning of the diversion and the attack on Zara, Pope Innocent III expressed disapproval and excommunicated the leaders of the Fourth Crusade.

This was another gamechanger for the crusaders. Dandolo continued to play a key role in the events of the Fourth Crusade, persuading the crusaders to divert their efforts to Constantinople. On April 12, 1204, the crusaders breached the walls of Constantinople, subjecting the city to widespread looting, arson, and violence for three days. Following the sack, the crusaders established the Latin Empire of Constantinople, exacerbating the East-West Schism between the Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church. In 1261, the Byzantine Empire, led by Michael VIII Palaiologos, managed to reconquer Constantinople, marking the end of the Latin Empire. However, the city continued to decline in the face of external pressures, eventually falling to the Ottoman Empire in 1453.

Power plays of Pope Innocent III in Medieval Europe