A short note on the Battle of Grunwald

In many of my recent posts, I focus on regions in North-Eastern Poland and the Baltic States, also referring to their history. In the Middle Ages they were – at least partially – controlled by the Teutonic Order, who engaged into military conflicts with the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. This conflict ended with one of the largest and most significant battles in the history of Eastern Europe – the Battle of Grunwald (Tannenberg), fought on July 15, 1410. The allied forces of the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, led by King Władysław II Jagiełło of Poland (formerely Grand Duke Jogaila of Lithuania) and Grand Duke of Lithuania Vytautas fought against the Teutonic Knights commanded by Grand Master Ulrich von Jungingen.

Jogaila and Vytautas were cousins. Their fathers Algirdas and Kęstutis respectively were brothers, sons of the Grand Duke of Lithuania. In younger years the relationship between Jogaila and Vytautas was marked by power struggles. Vytautas challenged Jogaila’s authority in Lithuania. But in 1385. Jogaila accepted Christianity, married Queen Jadwiga of Poland, and was crowned as King Władysław II Jagiełło of Poland. Vytautas was granted the title of Grand Duke of Lithuania under the suzerainty of Władysław II Jagiełło. This way their familiar conflict over throne was solved and a strong alliance was formed that strengthened their hold against the Teutonic Order.

The battle of Grunwald took place on the territory of the Monastic State of the Teutonic Knights, present-day Poland. The battle was massive in scale, involving around 50,000 to 60,000 troops in total. The Polish-Lithuanian forces, though outnumbered, were better coordinated and employed a mix of heavy cavalry and tactical infantry maneuvers. The Teutonic Knights, renowned for their heavy cavalry, were initially successful. But the Lithuanian forces had feigned a retreat and later returned to the battlefield. This move caused confusion and disarray among the Teutonic ranks. The Grand Master of the Teutonic Knights, Ulrich von Jungingen, was killed, leading to a collapse in the order’s morale and command structure. The Battle of Grunwald was a decisive victory for the Polish-Lithuanian alliance and marked the beginning of the decline of the Teutonic Order’s power in the region.

Currently, each year, on the former battlefield, a reconstruction of the Battle of Grunwald is organized, attracting reenactors not only from Poland, Lithuania, and Germany, but also from many other European countries.

Post Scriptum: there is also a link between this post and a post I wrote a few days ago on Bona Sforza. King Władysław II Jagiełło established the Jagiellonian dynasty in Poland. Bona Sforza was married to one of his descendants, and was mother to the last king of Jagiellonian dynasty.

A short note on the Battle of Grunwald

Jan III Sobieski and the Battle of Vienna in the Vatican Museums

The Vatican Museums are home to one of the world’s greatest collections of art. Most visitors come to admire the Raphael Rooms, the Sistine Chapel, or the extraordinary collection of classical sculpture. It is easy to spend hours looking at masterpieces created by some of the most famous artists in history.

While walking through one of the galleries, however, I stopped in front of a painting I had not expected to find there. It was enormous, stretching almost nine metres across, and at its centre was a mounted commander surrounded by soldiers, clergy, and captured Ottoman banners. To most visitors, it is simply another large historical painting. To a Pole, the central figure is immediately recognisable. It is Jan III Sobieski, King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania.

At first, I simply wondered why such a monumental painting of a Polish ruler was hanging in the Vatican Museums. The answer turned out to be far more interesting than I expected. It is not only the story of one of Europe’s most important battles, but also of an artist, a pope, and a painting created two centuries after the events it depicts.

At first glance, the painting appears to depict the aftermath of a military victory. The battlefield itself is no longer the focus. Instead, Jan Matejko concentrated on the people and symbols that, in his view, best represented the significance of the event.

The central figure is King Jan III Sobieski, mounted on a white horse and placed slightly above everyone else. Rather than charging into battle, he appears calm and composed. In his outstretched hand he holds a letter announcing the victory, while around him gather soldiers, commanders, clergy, and members of his entourage. The composition immediately directs the viewer’s attention to the king, making him the undisputed focal point of the scene.

One of the most striking details is the collection of captured Ottoman banners displayed in the foreground. In the seventeenth century, military standards were among the most valuable trophies that an army could seize. Their presence in the painting is a clear indication that the battle has already been won.

Matejko also filled the canvas with remarkable historical detail. Armour, weapons, horse harnesses, ceremonial clothing, and military equipment were all carefully researched before the painting was completed. Like many of his historical works, the canvas rewards close observation. The longer you look, the more individual figures and symbolic details begin to emerge.

Despite its monumental scale, the painting does not celebrate violence. There are no dramatic scenes of fighting or moments of personal heroism on the battlefield. Instead, Matejko chose a quieter and more ceremonial moment. The victory has already been achieved. What remains is to announce it to the world.

This choice makes the painting quite different from many other famous battle scenes. Rather than depicting the climax of the conflict, Matejko focused on its consequences, presenting the event as both a military success and a diplomatic achievement.

Jan III Sobieski (1629–1696) was one of the most accomplished military commanders of the 17th century and is regarded as one of Poland’s greatest monarchs. Before becoming king, he spent decades serving in the army of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, gaining experience in campaigns against the Cossacks, the Crimean Tatars, and the Ottoman Empire. His military talent, combined with political skill, earned him widespread respect both at home and abroad.

Sobieski was born into one of the most influential noble families of the Commonwealth. Unlike many European monarchs, he did not inherit the throne. Poland and Lithuania formed an elective monarchy, which meant that every new king was chosen by the nobility rather than succeeding automatically through birth. After the death of King Michał Korybut Wiśniowiecki, Sobieski was elected king in 1674, largely because of his outstanding military reputation.

His rise to the throne had been sealed only months earlier by the Battle of Khotyn in 1673. Commanding the Commonwealth’s army, Sobieski defeated a much larger Ottoman force, winning one of the most important Polish victories of the century. The triumph turned him into a national hero and made him the obvious candidate for the crown.

Despite his military achievements, Sobieski was far more than a battlefield commander. He received an excellent education, studied at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, and travelled extensively across Western Europe as a young man. During these journeys he became familiar with the courts of France, Germany, and the Netherlands, broadening his political outlook and developing an interest in science, architecture, and the arts. Like many members of the educated European elite of his time, he spoke several languages, including Latin, French, Italian, and Turkish.

When Sobieski became king, the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth was still one of the largest states in Europe, stretching from the Baltic almost to the Black Sea. Its territory covered much of present-day Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and large parts of Ukraine. Although the Commonwealth remained a major European power, decades of war and growing political tensions had begun to weaken the state. Even so, its army was still regarded as one of the finest in Europe, and Sobieski himself was recognised as one of its most capable commanders.

By the late seventeenth century, the Ottoman Empire was one of the world’s largest and most powerful states. Its territory stretched from North Africa across the Middle East and deep into South-Eastern Europe. After the conquest of Constantinople in 1453, the Ottomans continued to expand into the Balkans, bringing large parts of the region under their control.

In the summer of 1683, a vast Ottoman army under the command of Grand Vizier Kara Mustafa Pasha laid siege to Vienna, the capital of the Habsburg Monarchy. The city was one of the most important political centres in Central Europe. If it had fallen, the balance of power in the region could have changed dramatically.

Emperor Leopold I appealed to his allies for help. The Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth honoured an alliance signed earlier that year, and King Jan III Sobieski personally led his army south to join the Imperial forces. The allied army included troops from the Habsburg lands and several German states, including Bavaria, Saxony, and Franconia. Although each contingent retained its own commanders, overall command of the coalition was entrusted to Sobieski.

The decisive battle took place on 12 September 1683. Fighting continued throughout the day as the allied forces gradually pushed the Ottoman army back towards its camp. Late in the afternoon, Sobieski launched the attack for which the battle is best remembered. More than 20,000 cavalry, including around 3,000 Polish Winged Hussars, charged down the slopes of the Kahlenberg towards the Ottoman positions. It remains one of the largest cavalry charges in recorded history.

The Ottoman lines collapsed, Kara Mustafa’s army retreated, and the siege of Vienna came to an end. The victory brought Jan III Sobieski international recognition and marked a turning point in the long struggle between the Habsburg Monarchy and the Ottoman Empire. Although the Ottomans remained a major power for many decades, their expansion into Central Europe had effectively come to an end.

Shortly after the battle, Sobieski sent a message to Pope Innocent XI, announcing the victory. In a deliberate reference to Julius Caesar’s famous words Veni, vidi, vici (“I came, I saw, I conquered”), the Polish king wrote:

Venimus, vidimus, Deus vicit.
“We came, we saw, God conquered.”

The painting displayed in the Vatican Museums is Jan III Sobieski at Vienna, one of the largest works created by the Polish painter Jan Matejko (1838–1893). Measuring approximately 4.6 by 8.9 metres, it was painted between 1879 and 1883 to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the Battle of Vienna.

Matejko is widely regarded as Poland’s greatest historical painter. Throughout his career, he created monumental canvases depicting key moments in the country’s past, including The Battle of Grunwald, The Prussian Homage, and The Constitution of 3 May 1791. His paintings were based on extensive historical research. He studied written sources, historical costumes, weapons, armour, and works of art to make every scene as authentic as possible. Although many details inevitably reflected nineteenth-century artistic interpretation, his work shaped the way generations of Poles came to imagine their own history.

Interestingly, Matejko did not choose to paint the most dramatic moment of the battle itself. There are no charging Winged Hussars dominating the composition, nor is the focus on fighting or victory on the battlefield.

Instead, the artist depicted what happened after the battle.

At the centre of the painting sits King Jan III Sobieski on horseback. Around him are soldiers, commanders, clergy, and captured Ottoman banners. Sobieski is shown handing a letter to Bishop Jan Kazimierz Denhoff, who would carry the news of the victory to Pope Innocent XI in Rome.

The choice of this scene was deliberate. It linked the military victory outside Vienna with its wider significance for Europe and for the Holy See. Rather than presenting Sobieski simply as a victorious commander, Matejko portrayed him as the leader of an allied Christian army reporting the outcome of the campaign to the Pope.

The painting is filled with carefully researched historical details. Contemporary weapons, armour, military standards, liturgical vestments, horses, and ceremonial objects all contribute to the richness of the composition. Like many of Matejko’s works, it rewards close attention, revealing new details each time it is viewed.

When Jan Matejko completed the painting in 1883, it immediately attracted enormous attention. Measuring almost nine metres in width, it was one of the largest historical paintings ever created by the artist and presented considerable logistical challenges. Transporting such a monumental canvas across Europe required careful planning, while displaying it demanded a suitably large interior.

Before leaving for Rome, the painting was exhibited in Kraków, where it was seen by thousands of visitors. Interest was enormous, not only because of its size, but also because Matejko was already recognised as the leading historical painter of his generation. His latest work quickly became one of the artistic highlights of the bicentenary celebrations of the Battle of Vienna.

Later that year, the canvas was transported to Rome and formally presented to Pope Leo XIII during a ceremony attended by a Polish delegation. The Pope accepted the gift, and the painting became part of the Vatican collections.

Today, it remains one of the very few monumental works by Jan Matejko permanently displayed outside Poland. Visitors encounter it among paintings illustrating key moments in European history, where it continues to remind viewers of the role played by the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth in the events of 1683.

Jan III Sobieski and the Battle of Vienna in the Vatican Museums

The Mulberry harbour. Allied Logistics in Normandy

Many people around Europe when asked about Normandy in France, will quickly associate it with the D-Day. D-Day was the most massive seaborne invasion in history that took place on the 6th of June 1944. Allied forces from around 13 countries, among other US American, Canadian and British started an invasion aiming to liberate Europe from the Nazi Germany occupation.

The operation was planned for months in advance, with a large-scale deception campaign to mislead the Germans about the intended location of the invasion. On the day of the operation, over 156,000 Allied troops, including American, British, and Canadian soldiers, landed on the beaches of Normandy in northern France. The operation was preceded by airborne landings by paratroopers and glider-borne troops, who were tasked with securing key strategic points behind enemy lines. The landings themselves were met with heavy resistance from the German army, but ultimately the Allies were successful in establishing a foothold on French soil. The success of the D-Day invasion allowed the Allies to begin pushing the Germans out of France and ultimately led to the liberation of Paris on August 25, 1944. The operation was a major victory for the Allies and marked a turning point in the war, setting the stage for the eventual defeat of Germany.

Thus, sightseeing in Normandy, we planned to visit the Gold Beach, one of five beaches where the landing took place. Gold Beach was located on the eastern side of the Allied landing zone, between Omaha Beach to the west and Juno Beach to the east.

Gold Beach was assigned to the British 50th (Northumbrian) Infantry Division, supported by amphibious tanks of the 27th Armoured Brigade. The primary objective of the division was to capture the coastal towns of Arromanches and Bayeux, secure the bridges over the River Seulles, and link up with the Canadians at Juno Beach. The initial landing on Gold Beach was made by elements of the 50th Division at around 7:30 am, with the support of naval gunfire and aircraft. The beach was heavily fortified and defended by German troops, but the Allies were able to establish a beachhead and advance inland. The British were able to achieve their objectives for the day, including the capture of Arromanches. The capture of Bayeux on June 7th allowed the British to link up with the Americans at Omaha Beach and create a continuous front along the Normandy coast. The Battle for Gold Beach continued for several weeks as the Allies pushed inland, encountering strong resistance from the German forces. The successful landing at Gold Beach was a key part of the D-Day invasion.

In Arromanches and the Gold Beach we expected to see a monument and some wreckage of military equipment. Below, the views we saw on spot.

Not being a specialist in military issues, I thought that the wreckage we saw was that what was left of the floating or landing equipment. However, it was not. The collective knowledge is that during the landing, there were severe fights with a high death toll. But often it is forgotten that to provide soldiers with equipment, food and other things one needs to bring in much cargo. D-Day was also a large logistics operation. As the regular ports were in Nazi hands, the allied forces had to construct a provisional harbor. The solution was to build artificial harbors that could be towed across the English Channel and assembled on the Normandy coast. In fact, there were two harbors established – one at Omaha Beach and one in Arromanches at the Gold Beach called Port Winston.

Those ports had been named Mulberry harbours adter the Mulberry trees that grow in Britain. The code name “Mulberry” was chosen for the project because it was felt that it would be easy to remember and to keep secret. The connection between the Mulberry Harbours and Mulberry trees is primarily a naming coincidence.

The Mulberry Harbour was made up of a series of prefabricated concrete caissons, steel pontoons, and floating roadways that could be assembled and towed across the English Channel from Britain. Once in Normandy, the components were assembled to create a large artificial harbor that could accommodate the landing of troops, vehicles, and supplies.

Port Winston was the harbor at Arromanches and was completed just 10 days after the initial landings. It consisted of an outer breakwater formed by old ships, concrete caissons, and steel blocks, and an inner harbor created by floating roadways that were connected to the shore. Port Winston was a remarkable engineering achievement, allowing the Allies to bring in over 2.5 million men, 500,000 vehicles, and 4 million tons of supplies during the campaign in Normandy. The harbor remained in operation for several months and was critical to the success of the Allied campaign, allowing them to maintain a steady flow of troops and supplies despite German efforts to disrupt their supply lines. Today, the remains of Port Winston can still be seen at Arromanches, including the concrete caissons that formed the outer breakwater and the remains of the floating roadways that made up the inner harbor. It remains a testament to the ingenuity and resourcefulness of the Allies during World War II.

Below a sequence of pictures, I did in a small memorial center in Arromanches looking at an old panorama picture hanging at the entrance showing the harbor as it was operated in 1944.

The port was under operation for 10 months till regular ports on the continent were taken back from the Nazis. (The other one at the Omaha beach was destroyed earlier by a storm).

The Mulberry harbour. Allied Logistics in Normandy