The Life and Reign of Elizabeth I, Queen of England

To get a better sense of England’s history, it helps to look at the people who shaped it. Today’s focus is on Elizabeth I — a queen whose reign left a lasting mark on the country and helped define a golden age. Her story is full of power struggles, religious conflict, and personal strength, which made her one of the most memorable figures in British history. It’s also a good chance to revisit the history of religious divisions in Europe — a topic that will be coming up yet again in my posts.

Elizabeth I (1533–1603) was one of England’s most remarkable monarchs. Her reign, spanning from 1558 to 1603, is known as the Elizabethan Era, widely regarded as a Golden Age in the nation’s history. She governed during a time of intense religious turmoil, which she managed to navigate with careful balance, ultimately establishing a strong Protestant state. Her rule marked a flourishing of literature and maritime expansion, laying the foundations for England’s future global influence. However, her reign was also shadowed by her fraught relationship with a rival claimant to the throne — Mary, Queen of Scots. Elizabeth never married, earning her the title of the Virgin Queen, as she symbolically married England. Yet her persistent refusal to take a husband or name an heir stirred anxiety over the kingdom’s future and the stability of the succession.

Elizabeth I was the daughter of King Henry VIII of England and his second wife, Anne Boleyn. Although initially recognised as a legitimate heir, she was declared illegitimate and removed from the line of succession after her mother’s execution in 1536. Later, however, an Act of Succession passed by Parliament during Henry VIII’s lifetime reinstated her in the order of succession – though without restoring her full status as a lawful daughter. Before Elizabeth came to the throne, it was held by her half-brother Edward VI, the son of Henry VIII and his third wife, Jane Seymour, who died young at the age of 15. He was succeeded by Mary I, daughter of Henry and his first wife, Catherine of Aragon – a devout Catholic who died without issue. Upon her death in 1558, Elizabeth ascended the throne as the last surviving, legally acknowledged daughter of Henry VIII, in accordance with his will and the law of succession. Her claim to the crown was contested primarily by the Catholic faction and the supporters of Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots, who regarded Elizabeth as illegitimate, since the Catholic Church had never recognised Henry’s marriage to Anne Boleyn. The Pope had refused to annul Henry’s first marriage to Catherine of Aragon, and thus Elizabeth – being the daughter of his second wife – was viewed by Catholics as born out of wedlock. As a result, Mary Stuart, the great-granddaughter of Margaret Tudor (Henry VIII’s sister), was considered by many as the rightful heir to the English throne.

Elizabeth I’s childhood was difficult, politically charged, and filled with uncertainty, despite her birth as a princess and the daughter of a king. She was born on 7 September 1533, the child of Henry VIII and his second wife, Anne Boleyn. From the beginning of the pregnancy, there had been an expectation that the baby would be a boy – a male heir to the throne – so the birth of a girl was a deep disappointment to the king. When Elizabeth was just three years old, her mother was accused –almost certainly falsely – of treason, incest, and witchcraft, and was executed in 1536. At the same time, Henry VIII declared Elizabeth illegitimate, removing her from the line of succession. Elizabeth, however, remained at court and received an exceptional education, far exceeding the standards of the time – for both women and men. She was taught classical languages, logic, rhetoric, and philosophy. Elizabeth became fluent in Latin, Greek, French, and Italian, and wrote with remarkable elegance and precision. During the reign of her half-brother, Edward VI, she was kept at the margins of power, but the greatest danger came during the rule of Mary I. As a Protestant and a potential heir to the throne, Elizabeth was viewed with deep suspicion by the queen. In 1554, she was arrested and imprisoned in the Tower of London on suspicion of involvement in a plot against Mary. Although no evidence of her guilt was found, she spent several months living in fear for her life.

As queen, Elizabeth restored Protestantism, originally introduced in England by her father Henry VIII following the Catholic reign of her sister, Mary I, by passing acts, which established a form of religious compromise. It is important to recall that a central motivation for Henry VIII’s break with the Catholic Church was his desire to annul his marriage to Catherine of Aragon, as she had failed to produce a male heir, and he wished to marry Anne Boleyn, Elizabeth’s mother – something the Pope refused to permit. Elizabeth’s religious policy, however, was at times inconsistent. Though often seen as the architect of a compromise between Catholics and Protestants, in reality her reign was not free from religious persecution, particularly against Catholics. These intensified following her excommunication. In 1570, Pope Pius V issued the bull declaring her a heretic and an illegitimate monarch. He released her subjects from their duty of obedience to her, leading to serious political and religious consequences. The excommunication gave moral support to Catholic plots against Elizabeth and heightened the threat posed by Catholic powers, especially Spain. In its wake, the queen increased repression of Catholics, treating them as potential traitors.

The relationship between Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots was complex – marked by political tension, personal mistrust, and a struggle for power. Though the two queens were related – they differed in nearly every respect: Elizabeth was a Protestant who ruled a stable England, while Mary was a devout Catholic whose reign in Scotland ended in rebellion and forced abdication. In 1568, Mary fled to England, hoping Elizabeth would help her reclaim her throne. Instead, she was immediately imprisoned and remained in captivity for the next 19 years, held in various castles. Elizabeth saw her both as a royal cousin and a serious threat to the English crown. Following the plot by nobles – a plan to assassinate Elizabeth and place Mary on the throne – Mary, though not directly involved in the conspiracy, was tried for treason, sentenced to death, and executed on 8 February 1587 at Fotheringhay Castle. Mary’s death had serious consequences: it damaged relations with Catholic powers in Europe, particularly Spain, and partly contributed to the attempted Spanish Armada invasion.

The Spanish Armada launched its attack on England in 1588, driven by escalating religious, political, and economic tensions between Catholic Spain and Protestant England. King Philip II of Spain, a devout Catholic, aimed to overthrow Elizabeth I and restore Catholicism in England, especially after her excommunication by the Pope in 1570. Tensions were further fuelled by Elizabeth’s support for the Protestant Dutch revolt against Spanish rule, and her tolerance of English privateers like Francis Drake, who frequently raided Spanish ships and colonies. The execution of Mary, Queen of Scots in 1587 – a Catholic figure seen by many as the rightful heir to the English throne – became a major turning point. For Philip, it confirmed the heretical nature of Elizabeth’s rule and provided a clear justification for military action. The Spanish plan involved uniting their fleet with ground forces in the Netherlands before invading England. However, the campaign ended in complete failure — the English launched a successful counterattack, and storms in the North Sea destroyed much of the retreating Armada. The defeat was seen as a major victory for Elizabeth I, firmly establishing England as a rising naval power.

The aforementioned Francis Drake played a significant role in Elizabeth I’s foreign policy as a key figure in her indirect conflict with Spain. Operating as a privateer under a royal letter of marque, he attacked Spanish ships and colonies, bringing substantial wealth to England and weakening Philip II’s power, all while avoiding formal war. Though seen as piracy by the Spanish, Drake’s actions fit perfectly into Elizabeth’s strategy of provoking and undermining her rival without officially declaring war. At the same time, Elizabeth supported his voyages of exploration, and his successful circumnavigation of the globe (1577–1580) boosted England’s prestige as an emerging maritime power. His knighthood in 1581 sent a clear message: Elizabeth not only approved of his actions, but regarded him as a crucial part of her policy toward Spain and England’s growing global ambitions.

Although Elizabeth I was not a patron of the arts in the traditional sense, her reign created an exceptionally fertile environment for the growth of culture, literature, and theatre. She valued poetry, theatrical performances, and education, and while her financial support was often more symbolic than systematic, her court attracted writers and actors alike. She supported the development of theatre by granting licences and royal protection, which allowed companies like the Lord Chamberlain’s Men – associated with William Shakespeare – to flourish. Culture also served political purposes: through art, Elizabeth’s image as a powerful, almost divine monarch was carefully shaped, and the flourishing of literature helped to engage the public and strengthen national identity. During this time, the English language rose significantly in status as a medium of high culture – Elizabeth herself often used it in public speech, and the works of Shakespeare and others helped elevate it to a literary force of its own.

In domestic affairs, Elizabeth I ruled with a great deal of caution – often bordering on suspicion and authoritarianism – which was reflected in the development of an extensive intelligence network. His web of spies operated both at home and abroad, effectively uncovering plots, assassination attempts, and any signs of opposition to the queen. While this system ensured internal stability and protected Elizabeth from genuine threats, it also led to restrictions on freedom of speech and civil liberties. Discussions about religion or the royal succession were closely monitored, and public commentary on such matters could be considered treasonous. As a result, society lived under a sense of suspicion and self-censorship, making Elizabethan England – despite its cultural flourishing – a state with a tightly controlled public sphere.

Although Elizabeth I spent much of her reign successfully strengthening the state and the economy – maintaining relative internal peace and supporting trade and the growing middle class – by the end of her rule, the socio-economic situation began to deteriorate. The costs of prolonged conflict with Spain, increased spending on defence and naval forces, along with poor harvests and rising inflation, led to higher taxes, unemployment, and soaring prices. The lower classes were hit hardest, as they saw little benefit from the era’s overseas expansion and cultural flourishing. Social discontent was growing, increasingly at odds with the official image of a powerful and prosperous England.

Elizabeth I was known for her use of intense white face powder, which became a distinctive element of her royal image. Made from toxic lead-based white, the powder was used to hide the scars left by smallpox and to give her skin the pale, unnatural hue then considered a mark of aristocratic purity and social superiority. Her makeup was completed with reddened lips and cheeks, often coloured using equally harmful substances. Despite the damage these cosmetics caused over time, Elizabeth continued to use them, carefully crafting the image of an ageless and untouchable queen. In her later years, she became increasingly obsessed with her appearance and the effects of ageing; according to some accounts, she had mirrors removed from her palaces so she would not have to see the toll taken on her skin by the very makeup that had helped build her legend.

Elizabeth I died on 24 March 1603 at the age of 69, at Richmond Palace near London. Her death followed a long period of declining health – she suffered from weakness, insomnia, and depression. In her final days, she refused to lie down or allow doctors near her. She died childless, bringing an end to the Tudor dynasty. After her death, the throne passed to James VI of Scotland, who became James I of England, the first monarch of the Stuart dynasty. A great-grandson of Margaret Tudor, sister of Henry VIII, and the son of Mary Stuart, he held a legitimate and recognised claim to the English succession. His accession marked the beginning of the personal union between England and Scotland.

Although some Catholics hoped James might restore their faith, given his mother’s background, he maintained Protestantism as the state religion, and after the discovery of the Gunpowder Plot in 1605, Catholic persecution intensified. Later, his grandson James II – the last Catholic monarch of England – would attempt to reintroduce Catholicism during his reign, but was deposed in the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The throne then passed to his Protestant daughter Mary II and her husband William of Orange, firmly re-establishing Protestant rule and ensuring that Catholicism would never again return as the state religion in England.

The Life and Reign of Elizabeth I, Queen of England

Mary II Stuart, the Protestant Queen of England

Sometimes, when you travel to different countries and visit museums, you come across works by local artists that depict people or events significant to that country’s history. You might realise you’ve seen the same figure or story before — just in a different context. I had exactly that kind of déjà vu while going through photos of artworks I’d taken at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam. While walking through the museum, I didn’t have time to read every plaque. The artworks were so captivating that I simply photographed whatever caught my eye. One of those images turned out to be a bust of a noblewoman.

After returning home, I used Google Lens to identify the creator of the bust and the person it portrayed. I learned that the artist was Jan Michiel Rysbrack, and the bust depicted Mary II Stuart, Queen of England. That discovery piqued my curiosity, so I went online to find out more. To my surprise, I realised I had already written about her a few years ago — in a post on the history of … Scotland.

The sculptor, a renowned Flemish artist, made significant contributions to British art in the 18th century. Born in 1694 in Antwerp – now part of Flanders, the Dutch-speaking region of Belgium – he moved to London in 1720. Back in 1700, Antwerp was still part of the Spanish Netherlands, a region in the southern Low Countries that remained under Spanish control from the 16th century until the early 18th century. Because of my work, I’ve often travelled to Belgium, and my recent trip to the neighbouring Netherlands might be the perfect occasion to write a post on the fascinating history of this region sometime soon.

For now, however, I’ll turn my attention to Mary Stuart, and explore why a Queen of England from a Scottish dynasty is featured so prominently in one of the main galleries of the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam.

Mary II Stuart was born in 1662 at St. James’s Palace in London. She was the eldest daughter of James, Duke of York (later James II of England) and his first wife, Anne Hyde. Mary belonged to the Scottish Stuart dynasty, which had ruled England since the early 17th century. Although her father was a Catholic, Mary was raised as a Protestant – a decision that would prove crucial later in her life. Her uncle, Charles II, who was king at the time of her birth, was publicly Protestant, though he is believed to have converted to Catholicism on his deathbed. During his reign, it was politically expedient to maintain a Protestant public image in order to secure Parliament’s support and preserve stability. As for James, Mary’s father, the exact date of his conversion remains uncertain, but it is thought he became Catholic in the late 1660s. He kept his faith private for several years to avoid political repercussions, but by 1673, his conversion was publicly known. Nonetheless, keeping Mary’s Protestant upbringing was seen as vital to reassure Parliament and the English public that the Protestant succession would continue.

At the age of 15, in 1677, Mary married her first cousin, William of Orange – a Protestant and the son of William II, Prince of Orange, and Mary, Princess Royal of England, who was the daughter of Charles I of England. The marriage was part of a wider political effort to secure Protestant alliances for the British throne. At the time, Charles II, King of England and Mary’s uncle, was in poor health and – at least officially – remained Protestant.

William III of Orange was not King of the Netherlands in the modern sense of the term. Instead, he held the title of Stadtholder of the Dutch Republic from 1672. The Dutch Republic was a confederation of provinces in what is now the Netherlands, and the role of Stadtholder was neither hereditary nor equivalent to a monarchy. It was an appointed position, granted by the provinces, and primarily served as a military commander and political leader, rather than a sovereign ruler.

The Dutch Republic, officially known as the Republic of the Seven United Netherlands, was established in the northern part of the Low Countries in 1648, after gaining independence from Spain. Southern provinces such as Flanders, Brabant, and Hainaut remained under Spanish Catholic rule, a territory known as the Spanish Netherlands.

Mary’s father, James II, ascended to the English throne in 1685, but his Catholic faith and increasingly autocratic rule led to growing discontent across the kingdom. William’s marriage to Mary placed him in a strong position to challenge his father-in-law. In 1688, William III of Orange invaded England in what became known as the Glorious Revolution. James II fled to France, and William and Mary were jointly offered the throne by the English Parliament. Mary II reigned alongside William III until her death in 1694, and she was buried in Westminster Abbey. William continued to rule alone until his own death in 1702.

In the years that followed, the Jacobites — supporters of the deposed Stuart king James II and his descendants — sought to restore the Stuart monarchy to the thrones of England, Scotland, and Ireland, but ultimately failed in their efforts. Great Britain remained Protestant, and the Hanoverian dynasty eventually solidified its rule. The name Jacobite comes from Jacobus, the Latin form of James.

Mary II Stuart, the Protestant Queen of England

Bath Abbey

When almost a year after my departure, I finally managed to go through the photos from the Altes Museum in Berlin, connecting the pictures of the Roman Collection with the photos of ancient ruins in Rome, I realized that I’m missing photos of Roman-era ruins from England. Indeed, the Roman Empire reached there as well. Either the photos did not want to load from the server or they simply are not here. So I copied all the originals from England yet again to my computer and discovered that I had never processed some of them.

When we were in England, which was eight years ago, it was almost incessantly raining. Many photos can only remind me of the trip, but they show interesting places in torrents of rain, so they’re not particularly suitable for showing. However, I also found some that were taken indoors in beautiful locations. Below is one of such places – Bath Abbey in English Bath.

Bath is a historic city located in Somerset, England. It is known for its Roman-built baths and natural hot springs. Bath’s history dates back to the Roman period when it was known as Aquae Sulis. The Romans built elaborate baths and a temple complex around the natural hot springs, which were believed to have healing properties. These Roman Baths are one of the city’s most famous attractions and are still partially preserved.

Bath Abbey, formally known as the Abbey Church of Saint Peter and Saint Paul, is an impressive medieval cathedral located in the heart of the city. The history of Bath Abbey can be traced back to the 7th century when it was originally founded as a Benedictine monastery. Over the centuries, the Abbey went through several transformations and expansions, reflecting various architectural styles. The current structure of Bath Abbey predominantly showcases stunning Gothic architecture. The abbey features soaring pointed arches, intricate stone carvings, and large stained glass windows that allow beautiful light to filter into the interior.

The first thing that catches your attention when entering this cathedral is its magnificent ceilings. As far as I can remember, it was the first time I saw this architectural style. These are called rib vaults. Rib vaults consist of a series of ribbed arches that are arranged in regular patterns and intersect with each other. The ribs are made of stone or brick and form the fundamental structure of the vault. The ribs provide support and distribute the load, allowing for the construction of larger and more intricate spaces. Rib vaults occur in various patterns and styles, depending on the era and architectural style. In Bath Abbey, Gothic rib vaults dominate, characterized by intricate networks of ribs in different shapes, such as pointed, lierne, or tierceron ribs. These ribs form elaborate patterns resembling foliage, ivory, or floral motifs. The construction of rib vaults requires precision and stonemasonry skills. The ribs are formed using centering, and the stones or bricks are meticulously fitted together. Building rib vaults requires the involvement of skilled craftsmen and is an example of excellence in medieval architecture.

Another stunning eye-catcher in Bath Abbery are the stained-glass windows. The colorful stained glass panels depict biblical scenes, saints, and other religious motifs, filling the abbey with a kaleidoscope of light and color.


Below are a few more photos from this cathedral. When I took them, I only had a simple camera with a small zoom. I think that if I were to capture the interior today, after a few overall shots, I would focus more on taking close-ups of individual decorative elements of the cathedral.

What stayed with me was not just the beauty of the stained glass or the height of the nave, but the sense of order held quietly in the stone. The ribbed vaults, so precise and weightless, seem to organise not only the space above, but the thoughts within.

Bath Abbey